-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom Tromey wrote: > Piling on, I'd like us to ship the 'ecj' branch of gcj instead. > This is a major upgrade including generics. Does the ecj branch have any runtime support for generics, or is it just compile-time support? > It's not clear whether we can do this in a reasonable timeframe though. > And I'm sure some would argue that we've already passed the point of > reasonableness. I don't think it matters that it's being done late in the test cycle. The new classpath versions are generally so much better than the old ones, that I think it will be worth it. I will be wanted to test the libgcj rpm whenever it is released. I was actually able to build HEAD (4.2) with the 4.1.1 compiler with a few changes, but then the bins don't look in the right place for the .spec file, etc. I don't know if that kind of setup is supported anyway, but at least HEAD already has 0.91 checked in. - -- Sincerely, David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mandriva - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEvSzyN5thZBYlTwkRAjz9AJ9JAvjlgDdrScH/SWCW7HU5Y7VKIgCeOm2m 3dGfq5M/XCLoTMDO5R0S/xI= =wBcS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
