On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 19:26 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 16:28 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > > So, the next option is to look at using FOP without Batik. If this is > > even possible I suppose this means no SVG processing in FOP. > > This isn't possible. Batik is fundamental to getting fop to work. > > We're stuck until somebody tackles Batik. Ok, so I tackled Batik and have an SRPM that builds now. This basically boiled down to removing JPEG and TIFF image handling, but - in theory - PNG support should work. The changes weren't nearly as bad as I first thought. Other than removing classes from the build, I only had to add two patches. But now we're stuck on GNU Classpath/libgcj not implementing some core AWT functionality in java.awt.BasicStroke. There was already a bug filed for this: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22938 gnu.java.awt.peer.gtk.GdkTextLayout.getCharacterLevel(int) is also a problem. Hopefully somebody (fitzsim?) can comment on the status of these classes. This goal of rendering Fedora docs on a free stack is beginning to look like an FC6 goal. AG
