Ian Pilcher wrote: > Gary Benson wrote: > > Suggestions welcome :) > > I'm not sure what the best solution is, but here are some > alternatives to consider: > > 1. Change the names of gcj packages, so that they don't match the > JPackage versions. For example, gcj-tomcat5 could "provide" > tomcat5. It should be pretty easy to conditionalize this in > the SPEC files. You wouldn't believe how awful this is. I've done it before, for Stronghold. It seems trivial, but it's actually a nightmare, and the total package count in Stronghold was a tenth of what we're dealing with now. > 2. Move the Fedora gcj packages into a separate repository from the > rest of the distribution. This would at least allow people to > create a "pure" JPackage system by simply disabling this repo. > > That's all I can think of for now. Perhaps others have ideas. > > -- > ======================================================================== > Ian Pilcher i.pilcher@xxxxxxxxxxx > ======================================================================== > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
