Ian Pilcher writes: > Gary Benson wrote: > > Suggestions welcome :) > > I'm not sure what the best solution is, but here are some alternatives > to consider: > > 1. Change the names of gcj packages, so that they don't match the > JPackage versions. For example, gcj-tomcat5 could "provide" > tomcat5. It should be pretty easy to conditionalize this in the > SPEC files. > > 2. Move the Fedora gcj packages into a separate repository from the > rest of the distribution. This would at least allow people to > create a "pure" JPackage system by simply disabling this repo. This seems like a really bad idea because it doesn't allow gcj packages to provide dependencies for JPackages. > That's all I can think of for now. Perhaps others have ideas. Andrew.
