On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 15:19 -0700, Anthony Green wrote: > On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:58 -0700, John M. Gabriele wrote: > > What's preferred for use on FC4: jogl or lwjgl? Or > > is there a third option -- maybe some way to do it > > with Java-Gnome? > > The java bindings for SDL include OpenGL support and are known to work > with gcj. > > A while ago I considered pushing my jogl RPMs into Fedora Extras, but > there's a little problem that bothers me. Our libjawt isn't binary > compatible with the Sun/IBM/BEA version, so I can't create a single jogl > RPM that will work with every "java" alternative. Maybe this shouldn't > concern me too much, but it does. > > The problem is that Sun doesn't publish the contents of jawt.h in a form > we can use, so I'm fairly certain our data structures are different from > Suns (we just infer the contents of jawt.h by looking at open source > code that uses it). > > Suggestions on how to address this problem welcome... Yes, does anyone know of a tool that can extract structs from shared libraries? Tom > > AG > > > -- > fedora-devel-java-list mailing list > fedora-devel-java-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-java-list
