On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 10:58 -0400, Bryce McKinlay wrote: > I propose: > > 1. Removing JTA from libgcj/classpath (leaving just the 3 exceptions in > javax.transaction which are provided by the J2SE) > 2. Remove the jta.jar link from java-gcj-compat > 3. Include a separate jta package in Fedora that contains jta.jar > > Anyone have concerns/problems with this? I proposed an RPM back in March that generated a jta.jar directly from the installed libgcj.jar, https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-java-list/2005-March/msg00023.html Later I suggested it would be better to simply add this logic to the GCC spec file (on an internal RH mailing list I'm afraid). AG
