On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 10:58 -0400, Bryce McKinlay wrote: > java-1.4.2-gcj-compat provides a jta.jar which is linked against > libgcj's libgcj.jar. > > It seems that libgcj is wrong to include JTA in the core class > libraries. Previous J2SE versions may have included all of > javax.transaction, but the current specs for 1.4.2 and 1.5 show that the > J2SE now only includes a few exceptions, which are required by CORBA. > > Further, this creates difficulties testing FC's Jonas with other > jpackaged JVMs because they require a separate jta.jar. > > I propose: > > 1. Removing JTA from libgcj/classpath (leaving just the 3 exceptions in > javax.transaction which are provided by the J2SE) > 2. Remove the jta.jar link from java-gcj-compat > 3. Include a separate jta package in Fedora that contains jta.jar > > Anyone have concerns/problems with this? Sounds good. You'll need to do 1) either upstream or in the Rawhide GCC RPMs. Gary and I can handle 2 and 3. Tom
