> Are you asking, should we use the releng "plugins" to build them? > Assuming you mean that, I think we should. Otherwise we're creating > a redundant second build system. JPackage generally uses whatever build > system the upstream project uses - be that ant, maven or whatever. JPackage already package GEF and I don't think they use that project's releng plug-in (at least not the last time I looked). There are many problem with the releng plug-in (as discussed in Ben's proposal that Andrew posted), but point well taken on re-solving the problem. > Could you post (to me, or to the list) the .spec files you have done for > RHDS? They basically render down to calling the releng plugins and tar'ing up the output. However they are based on old versions of the VE/EMF/GEF and still expect zips to drop instead of tar.gz. Also the spec files do not use GCJ. We basically rewrote the CDT spec file for Fedora from the ground up, and it has little (if any) similarity to the spec file in RHDS. Let me ask about the spec files, but even better, I'll attempt a first GCJ spec cut for VE/GEF/EMF based off the CDT spec file, with the appropriate GCJ/dbtool bits worked in. Phil -- GPG Key ID: 1024D/239442FF
