On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 14:19 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > his is pretty much the case now. > > Well we're not yet at the point where you can feed all the srpms to a > build farm and everything builds with gcj. > > Though I do agree most of the problems are not gcj-specific (but some are) Yes, I think we're in pretty decent shape. I've tried grabbing random SRPMS from jpackage and building/installing with java-gcj-compat. Most packages just work. Of those that didn't, most were because of dependencies on non-free packages I don't want to install. Very few (if any) were gcj/ecj problems. I'm sorry I don't have real data. This was a couple of months ago. AG
