Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > On Mar 10 mai 2005 14:11, Gary Benson a écrit : > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Packages on jpackage.org are supposed to be jvm-agnostic (there > > > are bugs like anywhere else too). Once gcj has a complete > > > drop-in jvm personality they are supposed to all work as-is. > > > > This is pretty much the case now. > > Well we're not yet at the point where you can feed all the srpms to > a build farm and everything builds with gcj. Sure, but the drop-in jvm personality is pretty much complete. > Though I do agree most of the problems are not gcj-specific (but > some are) Yeah, the majority of things I've come across are in the class library, either because bits are missing or because I'm exercising bits that haven't been exercised before. Gary
