Re: [fedora-java] Re: [JPackage-discuss] Why libswt3-gtk2 isn't split between lib and plugin? also multiple SWTs and GCJ binaries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I think the message was't about the best Java GUI toolkit, but on how to package SWT and apps that depend on them. Nothing prevents the packaging of Java-Gnome and apps that depends on it, and it was done at least by Fedora.

If everyone would package just the "best" app/library for each category, How would sendmail/postfix and Gnome/KDE users feel?

But if you don't mind having your app running on Linux only (actually on BSD and other Unixes) Java-Gnome would be a better toolkit. Go see their websites and mailing list archives for specific reaons. :-) Actually, using Java-Gnome is not Unix-only, just nobody did the port for Windows. GTK itself and many apps, like Gimp and Ethereal, run fine under Windows using the GTK port.


[]s, Fernando Lozano

On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:14:22PM -0400, Andrew Overholt wrote:
What about Java-GNOME?

Java-GNOME is a fine project, but in all honesty, SWT is a tried-tested-and-true solution. Moreover it gives you cross-platform
compatibility to Windows (and like it or not, Windows does
matter on the desktop).

I don't use many Java apps on the desktop. In fact, I used to
*hate* java for desktop app because of Swing (mind you, I do
Java for a living :)). And yeah, AWT is a joke nowadays for
anything serious, so it's not even worth a mention.

Eclipse changed all that for me. It showed me that a Java app
can look and feel "native". It's nice. If I needed to do a
desktop app and wanted to code it in Java, why pick anything
else other than SWT for my toolkit?



[Index of Archives]     [Red Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux