* David Walluck <david@xxxxxxxx> [2005-04-10 00:13]: > Andrew Overholt wrote: > > >Oh yeah. I forgot that we had done that. I'm open to change if it's > >necessary but I forget what is in (or was, in our case :) eclipse-gtk2. > > Unless there's a good reason not to, it makes sense to have libswt > separate from any eclipse stuff so that using libswt doesn't pull in > (parts of) the IDE. I folded eclipse-gtk2 into eclipse-platform to reduce the sub-package count. The libswt3-gtk2 package still contains just SWT stuff so you can run SWT apps with just that installed. If someone does decide to do the work to have motif sub-packages (or fox ones), then I guess whatever used to be in eclipse-gtk2 will have to be resurrected and similar -motif and -fox packages will need to be created. Andrew
