Le mercredi 16 mars 2005 à 21:43 -0800, Kenneth Porter a écrit : > --On Wednesday, March 16, 2005 8:34 PM -0800 Anthony Green > <green@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I just noticed that we don't build jk (from tomcat5) or package mod_jk > > (or should that be jk2/mod_jk2?). It seems weird to package tomcat5, > > but not the Apache httpd connector. Is it too late to squeeze into FC4? > > FC2 included mod_jk2, which is now deprecated. But jk1 should be fine - it survived several rewrite attempts, the latest being jk2. jk1 is still actively developed and maintained, with regular releases. Never understood why FC went for jk2 myself. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
