On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 11:30 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Ziga Mahkovec writes: > > And somehow a single map seems like a cleaner solution. But those > > are minor issues. Any improvement over the current situation would > > help. > > It should be just fine. Try it. > > When used as I describe, almost all of the time is spent reading the > jar files, not creating the maps. There's nothing you can do about > the maps that will make the process any faster. When building jonas, > which has 28871 classes in 239 jar files, the whole process takes > 1m1.140s on my box. Sounds great, thanks for all the clarifications! Just one final question (I promise (-:). Would it be possible (and make sense) to move the "gcj-dbtool -a" stage from %post to %install? I'm thinking the build system has enough information to compile the map -- when installing the package, only merging would then take place. This would offload most of the disk IO to the build system. -- Ziga
