On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 10:29 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: > Ziga Mahkovec writes: > > Maybe this could be further improved by creating a single separate map > > for all new jar files (utilizing a new "--unsafe" gcj-dbtool switch > > which triggers the behavior in the patch). Then, only two maps would > > have to be merged, avoiding the need to create 150 separate maps. > > What's the problem with creating 150 separate maps? I don't get it. Fragmentation I guess. Each new map would have to over-allocate enough space for a jar file to avoid resizing. And somehow a single map seems like a cleaner solution. But those are minor issues. Any improvement over the current situation would help. -- Ziga
