On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:59:36PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora <jpazdziora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote: >> >> Hello all, >> >> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release >> >> Engineering[1], I am pleased to announce the latest Fedora Layered >> >> Image Release. This follows the latest Atomic Host Release that came >> >> out yesterday[2]. >> >> >> >> At this time the following Container Images are available in the >> >> Fedora Registry. >> >> >> >> >> >> Base Images: >> >> >> >> (Note that the "latest" tag currently points to "25" and the "rawhide" >> >> tag currently points to "27", if no tag is provided in your pull >> >> command then it will always default to "latest") >> >> >> >> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:latest >> >> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide >> >> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:27 >> > >> > The current registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:rawhide and >> > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:27 image 202b880ac136 says it's >> > 7 weeks old, >> > >> >> registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26 >> > >> > Fedora 26 image is 4 months old. >> > >> > What are the plans for respining these images on regular basis? >> > Especially the development "releases" tend to change quite heaving and >> > if we do not want to encourage the use of >> > >> > RUN dnf upgrade -y >> > >> > in every Dockerfile, we might want to make it easy for people to >> > consume fresh content. >> > >> > Incidently, registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 is rather new, just >> > 13 days old. >> >> Yes, the current stable is planned to be respun on a two-week average. >> The others as well but they aren't priority right now. There's an >> automation process in the works and once that is done then all of >> these will happen automatically. > > One problem with the current Fedora 26 image is that it enables > rawhide repo and not the 26 development repo. So anybody using that > image to build something which installs additional packages will get > Fedora 27, not Fedora 26 packages installed. > > Could the registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26 be respun to point to > the correct Fedora 26 package source? > Absolutely. I went to look into that today but the koji builder tasks were having an issue for the last few weeks. It turns out that there was a bug in oz (which is used in image builds in koji). This has been fixed and we should be able to get updates out tomorrow. -AdamM > Thank you, > > -- > Jan Pazdziora > Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
