[atomic-wg] Issue #254 `Label/comment for primary RPM?`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



jberkus reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
In the 3/10/2017 VFAD, we decided that VERSION would be 0 pending updating FLIBS to support automatically pulling the version from the "primary RPM" in the container.

However, we are not currently collecting information from maintainers about which RPM is the primary one.

Should we have a label or structured comment, required, which contains this information?

Ref #235
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/254
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux