[atomic-wg] Issue #233 `Container guidelines for systemd based containers`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



adelton added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
> BTW Even if we got oci-systemd-hook into debian, we would still need to get projectatomic/docker in since docker rejected the patch to run hooks directly.

Would it help if the execution of the hook was dependent on some label in the image? That way the container author could have more control over the behaviour and docker might be more inclined to allow that mechanism.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/233
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux