[atomic-wg] Issue #229 `decide on version scheme and image naming scheme for f26`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



walters added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
I'd vote for images having a simple serial number - in the case where we have to respin the cloud image because we changed the kickstart but *not* the tree, we'd go from `-1` to `-2` or so.

i.e.:

```
Fedora-Atomic-25.20170130.0-1.x86_64.qcow2
```

That said I think we're going to run into pungi issues here.
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/229
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux