[atomic-wg] Issue #229 `decide on version scheme and image naming scheme for f26`

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
ok so let me flesh this out just a little more. Current proposal is something like `25.20170130.0` just for the OSTree *version* that is part of the ostree repo; i.e. the version you see when you run `rpm-ostree status`. Now we have to figure out what we want the disk image name and iso names to look like. Here is what we have today:

```
Fedora-Atomic-25-20170215.1.x86_64.qcow2
```

Basically `Fedora-Atomic-{major-version}-{compose-date}.{respin-number}.{arch}.qcow2`. If we start putting the OSTree version in the name of the images what would it look like? Something like this:

```
Fedora-Atomic-25-20170215.1-OSTree-25.20170130.0.x86_64.qcow2
```

Starts to get a little long but I do see the need to have both uniquely identifying compose information as well as uniquely identifying OSTree information in the name. This is just a guess at what this could look like. Thoughts? 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/229
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list -- cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to cloud-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux