On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:09:51PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > Thanks — that's good feedback. One possibility — especially as Fedora > > Server does its own rethink — is for the Fedora Cloud Base to migrate > > to Fedora Server WG. Another would be for it to continue as a Spin (or > > the analog of that, now that we've redefined Spins to be desktop tech). > Have we formally redefined it as such? I feel like either I've been > asleep and missed a lot (I don't think so?), people are having > discussions around these things in places that are harder to follow, > or people are making assumptions. I'm not sure about formality, but it's effectively so due to the new website design, which has https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ "Alternative desktops for Fedora" and https://labs.fedoraproject.org/ "Functional bundles for Fedora" > Also, while not explicitly so, Atomic Host (more os-tree) is a > foundation for the work that Workstation is looking at as well. Which > is where some of my surprise comes from I guess. I thought we'd > finally have some cohesion between the Editions, at least at a > fundamentals level. That's still possible I guess. Yeah, I don't think that's necessarily in confict. It basically ends up being two separate Editions built on Atomic technology. > > Design: Website refresh for sure. New logo. Possibly some UX work on > > whatever we promote as an installer/configurator. > I don't see a need for a new logo. It's throwing out the well done > and now somewhat familiar branding work we've built up. However, > people like new pretty things so whatever. Fortunately the https://getfedora.org/static/images/cloud-logo.png logo *does* work well for "container cluster" as well. It was designed with the idea of scale-out computing. > > Re-Eng: We'll have to decide if we want to do two-week releases a la > > current Atomic, or tie to the normal six-month schedule, or something > > else. (Maybe three-month releases while the two-week Atomic Host > > continues underneath?) Plus, possible multiple images for different > > cluster roles; I dunno. > I kind of think you want to stop calling them releases to be honest. > They aren't releases in the grand Fedora sense of the word. They're > bundled and focused updates (service packs?) of content within the > grand Fedora release cycle. Sure, I'm open to another term. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
