On 03/13/2016 03:04 PM, Steve Gordon wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>> From: "Kai Qiang Wu" <wkqwu@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: "Steve Gordon" <sgordon@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Ton Ngo" <ton@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2016 5:07:17 AM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [magnum] Discussion of supporting
>> single/multiple OS distro
>
>> Hi Steve，
>> I think what you did is rpm version, here is my finding:
>
>> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ rpm -qa |
>> grep kubernetes
>> kubernetes-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-node-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-client-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> kubernetes-master-1.1.0-0.17.git388061f.fc23.x86_64
>> [minion@k8-pdvmggl3ys-0-cdruybssooyh-kube-master-vtartl7oubyc ~]$ kubectl
>> version
>> Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
>> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
>> Server Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"0", GitVersion:"v1.0.6",
>> GitCommit:"388061f00f0d9e4d641f9ed4971c775e1654579d GitTreeState:"clean"}
>
>> It seems we should trust kubectl version, it is final version, it said
>> v1.0.6.
>
> Adding cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Folks, can you explain the reason for the discrepancy between the packages that appear to have been used to build the image and the tools themselves? Specifically looking at Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-23-20160308.x86_64.qcow2
There is some history behind that. There is a bug report for it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291860
The good news is that if you test out the kube 1.2 that is in updates testing and
give it some karma we might be able to release close to the same time that kubernetes
upstream releases 1.2:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a89f5ce5f4
- Dusty
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
