On 12/14/2015 09:42 PM, Adam Miller wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 12/14/2015 03:23 PM, Kushal Das wrote: >>> The third choice is already in the images along with systemd. We are >>> talking about enabling it as default networking stack. Ubuntu already >>> has a beta implementation in place with network instead of networking >>> scripts. >>> >>> If we have to stay ahead in innovation, we have to do things for the >>> "First" of our four foundation. We were ahead in adopting systemd, we >>> should do the same for Networkd. >> Anybody willing to put together (or already have) a list of PMI[1] info >> about the options so we can make a decision? > Not entirely sure this is what you're looking for but Major Hayden was > nice enough to do a write up for the Cloud SIG. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Network-Requirements > > Major also has some really interesting blog posts on his personal site > using systemd-networkd to do all sorts of things I didn't know it was > capable of: > > https://major.io/?s=networkd > > -AdamM > >> When do we need to decide by? Can we switch like, now, and then back it >> out if we find that it breaks all the things? >> >> [1] Plus, Minus, Interesting >> >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier | Community Team, OSAS >> jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ >> Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ +1 for systemd-networkd, RH should add it into rhel. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
