On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:31:45PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > The situation is not at all the same; there is no clear expectation > that networkd will replace NetworkManager, indeed AFAIK it's been > explicitly stated that it won't, because it's not desirable for it to > cover all the complex configurations NM supports. One development (mostly) since we started talking about this is that NM is now much more modular, and has a "configure and go away" mode (the lack of which was the main reason for not using it in the cloud image in the first place). It also can use the same lightweight DHCP library that systemd does, which in either case is an advantage over ye olde memory-hungry reference implementation as used by the initscripts networking. I'm not saying it's the automatic winner over systemd-networkd, but all that should be taken into consideration. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
