On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 11:26 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 6:39 PM, Adam Williamson >> <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Hi folks! For those who aren't aware, Fedora openQA is set up to test >> > the Atomic installer image nightly - that's the image that uses >> > anaconda to deploy a fixed Atomic host payload. >> >> It exists! I've been looking around for such a thing for a day and >> only found old blog posts. It's really non-obvious how to find it in >> koji. I can find lives. I can find other atomics. But somehow this one >> is like the G train in Brooklyn (OK the G *eventually* does show >> itself). > > It's not built by koji, which is why you can't find it there. It's an > installer image, it's built by pungi, just like netinst and DVD images. > > fedfind can find it, though. ;) That's what fedfind does! It finds > fed(ora)! I think I'd be helpful if the releng dashboard listed this build along with the other cloud images. I estimate my recall half-life for fedfind is about 15 days. Does anyone else think it'd be useful to have the nightly atomic installer ISO listed at https://apps.fedoraproject.org/releng-dash/ ? Or maybe even an Atomic specific section on the dashboard? >> > https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/ , you should see a build like >> > 'Build23_Postrelease_20151207' on the front page, >> >> OK I click on this, it shows the test, and that it failed. Any chance >> of it eventually linking to the image it tested so that it's possible >> to fall back to a manual test > > So, answer one: it actually does. The ISO tested is on the Logs & > Assets page, down at the bottom, under Assets. When I click on Postrelease_20151209, I end up here https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/overview?distri=fedora&version=23&build=23_Postrelease_20151209&groupid=1 There isn't anything down at the bottom, definitely no Logs & Assets page. Same with the other listings on the man openqa page... https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B_2Asp8DGjJ9cUpnY2ZuY0lIV2M >> More likely is if it passes all auto tests to have a link to >> the image so a manual test can try to blow it up, right? > > Eh, my take is that we don't/shouldn't exactly design our manual test > processes around openQA. This testing (of the post-release nightly > cloud images) is kind of a bonus thing I rigged up just because > maxamillion asked and it wasn't too difficult; the main point of openQA > is to aid in pre-release testing, and of course we have a more > developed test process there, where we have the regular 'nomination' of > nightly composes for manual testing, with the wiki pages with download > links and all the rest of it. We could certainly stand to draw up a > proper process for manual testing of post-release images, if we're > going to be releasing them officially, which apparently we are, but I'm > not the guy who's been keeping up on that stuff so I don't want to leap > in, I'm sure some folks already have ideas for doing that. Gotcha. Thanks! -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
