On Fri, Oct 02, 2015 at 05:01:51AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: > Heh, it seems that my career as Fedora-Dockerfiles comaintainer may > be rather short :) I think having a web frontend with pull requests > for the new dist-git is an awesome idea. I'm +0.9 for pagure. The > advantage is that it will be completely under Fedora control, the > small downside is that potential contributors from outside Fedora > will have to create Fedora account, which might scare some people > off. We want to make the web-pull-request process really easy for using Pagure as a documentation tool, too, so support for non-fedora-contributor drive-by contributions might come. > So IIUC, the standard way to get dockerfiles from dist-git would be > "fedpkg clone mariadb-docker" or similar. Perhaps we could provide a > wrapper that anyone, even without Fedora account, like > "fedora-get-dockerfile --list" or "fedora-get-dockerfile mariadb" > (this would invoke "fedpkg clone --anonymous mariadb-docker"). Cool. > > Maybe? Would it make sense for these to go together with the > > dockerfiles they're associated with in a git repo at that level, or > > would they be stand-alone and reference other repos? (Do you have > > some concrete examples?) > So I think that kubernetes/Nulecule examples should be standalone, > since most often they'll reference multiple images. What I mean is > that they would be a good fit for the current fedora-dockerfiles > repo, but if we split the repo into multiple dist-git repos, they > won't fit in any one of these. So, would all of _those_ examples go into a single entity (package, repo, whatever)? What should the distribution method for _these_ be? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
