On Friday, August 28, 2015 10:51:28 AM Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 08/28/2015 10:40 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Adam Miller > > <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > > > > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx > > > > <mailto:dennis@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Last night I had some time to myself, I decided to look at what it > > > would take to get atomic running on arm. after having to tweak some > > > of the json files. the hardcoded ref in it if not flexible at all > > > - "ref": "fedora-atomic/rawhide/x86_64/docker-host", > > > + "ref": "fedora-atomic/rawhide/armhfp/docker-host", > > > > > > Neither is the hardcoded packages, > > > - "grub2", "grub2-efi", "ostree-grub2", > > > - "efibootmgr", "shim", > > > + "extlinux-bootloader", > > > > > > the packages in every other part of our deliverables are dealt with > > > by using comps and yum/dnf skipping over missing things. Which made > > > me curious about how it was envisioned to support atomic on > > > multiple arches as it seems to be designed around a single arch > > > silo. > > > > > > However once I got past that I discovered that atomic and kubernetes > > > both had "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" in the spec files (Violating > > > packaging guidelines in the process) but they do actually build > > > just fine for all the primary arches and are installable on arm at > > > least. I was able to make a atomic repo in the end. I plan to > > > throw together a kickstart and attempt to install it as soon as I > > > can. > > > > This is awesome, let me know if you have something that you'd like > > help testing. I have a spare TrimSlice that's currently sitting idle > > and would love to see some Atomic action on it. :) > > > > > What will it take to fix the packaging and get people on board for > > > supporting the greater world? could it be something we work with > > > someone like https://www.scaleway.com/ who have arm based cloud > > > servers today to> > > support? > > > > How do we do that? Is there an official avenue to pursue working with > > cloud vendors? What was the process to get the Fedora Cloud image into > > IaaS providers with fedimg? (I assume some sort of relationship has to > > be established between Fedora as a project and the cloud provider) > > > > -AdamM > > > > Send the scaleway people an email, letting them know you are asking > > officially on behalf of Fedora cloud. > > In my personal dealings, they have been very nice to work with. > > I don't know how it came about, but I know that centos has 4 machines > > dedicated to them. I'm not saying that will happen, just saying it. > > It looks like we already have Fedora on Scaleway? > > https://www.scaleway.com/imagehub/fedora/ There is a fedora remix, it does not have our kernel. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
