On 08/28/2015 10:40 AM, Troy Dawson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Adam Miller > <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx > <mailto:dennis@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Last night I had some time to myself, I decided to look at what it would take > > to get atomic running on arm. after having to tweak some of the json files. > > the hardcoded ref in it if not flexible at all > > - "ref": "fedora-atomic/rawhide/x86_64/docker-host", > > + "ref": "fedora-atomic/rawhide/armhfp/docker-host", > > > > Neither is the hardcoded packages, > > - "grub2", "grub2-efi", "ostree-grub2", > > - "efibootmgr", "shim", > > + "extlinux-bootloader", > > > > the packages in every other part of our deliverables are dealt with by using > > comps and yum/dnf skipping over missing things. Which made me curious about > > how it was envisioned to support atomic on multiple arches as it seems to be > > designed around a single arch silo. > > > > However once I got past that I discovered that atomic and kubernetes both had > > "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" in the spec files (Violating packaging guidelines in > > the process) but they do actually build just fine for all the primary arches > > and are installable on arm at least. I was able to make a atomic repo in the > > end. I plan to throw together a kickstart and attempt to install it as soon > > as I can. > > This is awesome, let me know if you have something that you'd like > help testing. I have a spare TrimSlice that's currently sitting idle > and would love to see some Atomic action on it. :) > > > > > What will it take to fix the packaging and get people on board for supporting > > the greater world? could it be something we work with someone like > > https://www.scaleway.com/ who have arm based cloud servers today to > support? > > How do we do that? Is there an official avenue to pursue working with > cloud vendors? What was the process to get the Fedora Cloud image into > IaaS providers with fedimg? (I assume some sort of relationship has to > be established between Fedora as a project and the cloud provider) > > -AdamM > > > Send the scaleway people an email, letting them know you are asking > officially on behalf of Fedora cloud. > In my personal dealings, they have been very nice to work with. > I don't know how it came about, but I know that centos has 4 machines > dedicated to them. I'm not saying that will happen, just saying it. It looks like we already have Fedora on Scaleway? https://www.scaleway.com/imagehub/fedora/ Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Open Source and Standards (OSAS) jzb@xxxxxxxxxx | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://projectatomic.io/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
