On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 02:10:05PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > But in order to be really useful unless they're all-in on Fedora, many > > people will want the python version for their > > infrastructure/environment, not whichever python we happen to ship in a > > given release. > "I will provide flexibility and utility by providing no flexibility > and utility" sounds like a crappy marketing point to me. For a practical example: Ansible doesn't currently support Python 3. If we change the cloud image to python3 — as is the expected plan, right? — having that system python there doesn't provide any benefit. It's just extra weight. The early PRD called for a library of different images for different purposes, in addition to the base, and I think we're still interested in that — it's just not ready yet. That might include various ansible-ready or puppet-ready images, possibly with other tools installed as fits the use case. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
