On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 13:34 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:23:59 -0700, > Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:15 -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote: > > > >assigned a bug that's nominated as a blocker). We're probably going to > >have to change that mindset in a .next world: we would already quite > >*like* the expertise and input of folks outside QA/releng to the blocker > >process, but in a world with Products with more domain-specific release > >criteria, we're really going to need it. > > It's hard to get people to commit that much time at once. Jumping in to > help with 1 hour meetings is a lot easier than 3 hour ones. yeah, hence why this is more of an issue with the combined process. We can try to group the bugs for the combined meetings, however. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
