Re: Fedora.next QA planning: generic / Product-specific release criteria and blocker review issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:23:59 -0700,
 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 09:15 -0600, Mike Ruckman wrote:

assigned a bug that's nominated as a blocker). We're probably going to
have to change that mindset in a .next world: we would already quite
*like* the expertise and input of folks outside QA/releng to the blocker
process, but in a world with Products with more domain-specific release
criteria, we're really going to need it.

It's hard to get people to commit that much time at once. Jumping in to help with 1 hour meetings is a lot easier than 3 hour ones.
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux