On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:58:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As with all the others who've weighed in so far, I agree that the
> optimal path is just for us all to talk to each other. I generally
> prefer workflows that assume everyone's happy to work positively
> together to a consensus solution over ones that assume everything will
> be oppositional and must therefore go through a higher authority. So,
> yep, IMO we should just talk to each other, and FESCo should only be
> invoked to resolve irreconcilable disputes (of which we hope there won't
> be any).
Yeah, and especially with the way Josh put it, this approach seems obviously
better. Let's just pretend I didn't suggest the other way. :)
> Ideally I'd like to work fairly rapidly and get, say, the initial
> release criteria ready by the end of next week, and then get the
> required test cases and matrices written between then and branching
> (which is 'no earlier than July 8' on current schedule).
As someone who is not actually volunteering to do much more than cheerlead
for this particular bit of writing, that schedule sounds good to _me_....
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
