On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hi, folks! So, I quickly bashed out that draft F21 Test Plan I've been > threatening to write for the last month or so. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_Fedora_21_test_plan > So, what's the idea here? Psshh -- so much for your claim of not doing any real work. This looks great! I'll put discussing it on our next Cloud WG meeting. > * There are several practical implications from the test plan - just > Work We Need To Do. Most obviously, we need to draw up release criteria > and supporting test cases for the Fedora.next Products. We also will > need to adjust the Mike has some drafted up for cloud at <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs/Test_Plan#Test_Pass.2FFail_Criteria>. It'll need a bit more by way of specifics. > * Responsibilities! Particularly, in this *draft* Test Plan, I've > suggested that creating the Product-specific criteria and test cases > should be the responsibility of the relevant Working Groups, with > assistance from the QA team. They would also be jointly responsible, This seems like the right way to me, too. > for Fedora 21 testing *overall* - i.e. it's the QA team's responsibility > to make sure the WGs do the stuff assigned to them in the plan. If that > makes sense. Discussion welcome! Yeah. If something isn't working, do you think the best path is QA->WG directly, or should it be QA says something to FESCo, FESCo works with WG? Since parts of this are new to all of us, and other parts new to a lot of us, maybe it'd be good to put suggested/reasonable deadlines on some parts of the responsibilities? That helps put in focus what needs to be done. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Tepid change for the somewhat better!" _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
