Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:10:46PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > I think Josh is mostly there.  He has 58MB + 5M vmlinuz + <similar?>
> > firmwre.
> Firmware is owned by linux-firmware, not the kernel package.  I didn't
> include it in my kernel numbers for that reason.

Currently, this is required by the kernel for pre but not at runtime. (I
guess /bin/kernel-install ends up putting things into the initramfs.) Is
there any easy way to do that differently and any win from it?


> > Instead of competing with Ubuntu on minimalist can we compete on pretty
> > close but a lot more flexible?  Do Ubuntu users have much choice on how
> > they configure their environment?  Or is Fedora Cloud providing a generic
> > cookie cutter installation?
> Right, I kind of like that we'd have a smaller core package that is
> still broadly useful.

+1


-- 
Matthew Miller    --   Fedora Project    --    <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux