On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:02:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > If it's _necessary_, that's one thing. I've yet to really see any data > backing up necessity on any of this at all though. Right now it seems > to be sitting in the "nice to have" category. For the record, it is _literally_ sitting in our "nice to have" category. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud_Changelist#Change:_Cloud-Friendly_Kernel_Packaging :) > Perhaps someone from the cloud team could look at existing images from > other distros and figure out kernel sizes there, and how it plays into > usage and cost in those environments? On the ubuntu EC2 image, /lib/modules/$(uname -r) is 24M + 5.2M vmlinuz + 1.1M in /lib/firmware. Total package size is 32M on disk. And 5.9M initrd. CoreOS is bigger, with 33M in /lib/modules and 5.2M in lib/firmware, and a /19M vmlinuz. Which may just go to show that _calling_ yourself ultra-minimal and focused is actually more important than _being_ that. -- Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
