Re: Modular Kernel Packaging for Cloud

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 10:33:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Right.  When I said I had kernel-core and kernel-drivers, I wasn't
> being theoretical.  I already did the work in the spec file to split
> it into kernel-core and kernel-drivers.  The kernel package becomes a
> metapackage that requires the other two, so that existing installs and
> anaconda don't have to change (assuming I did thinks correctly).
> Cloud can just specify kernel-core in the kickstart or whatever.

Does yum's kernel-handling magic need to change to handle this? Probably you
have already thought of that.


> I think that's a reasonable start, and it's a significant reduction.
> Beyond that, we get into much less reduced savings and having to move
> stuff around on a finer level.  For the curious, I uploaded the module
> list here:

+1 to getting the low-hanging fruit and not worrying too much about the
stuff up on the hard to reach branches.


-- 
Matthew Miller    --   Fedora Project    --    <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux