On 09/12/2013 01:10 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:45:15PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
Both of these ideas might include the idea of having the Fedora Server
product actually also produce AMIs and qcow2 images as we do now from this
SIG.
Is it not better to wait for the what the server working group will
come up as the way forward in the server space for Fedora before
deciding anything like this?
Even though they're separate working groups and products, it doesn't need to
be so siloed that we can't talk to each other about possible overlap and
areas where we can support each other.
Well from my own personal view "cloud" falls under "server product" (
hence I dont see the purpose of separated cloud working group ) however
as I see it, the way forward for the server community is not actually
going to be delivering server product in iso format or vm image one.
JBG
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
