On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:45:15PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >Both of these ideas might include the idea of having the Fedora Server > >product actually also produce AMIs and qcow2 images as we do now from this > >SIG. > Is it not better to wait for the what the server working group will > come up as the way forward in the server space for Fedora before > deciding anything like this? Even though they're separate working groups and products, it doesn't need to be so siloed that we can't talk to each other about possible overlap and areas where we can support each other. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
