On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 12:22:53PM -0400, Shawn Starr wrote:Yeah, but you'll have to add a bunch of other packages for that, too, right?
> On Monday, July 01, 2013 12:09:08 PM Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Is this useful in the cloud image? It pulls in some stuff like slang and
> > newt. Is it useful to have in the base, or is it something people might add
> > if needed?
> If you need to adjust SSO (Single Sign On) capabilities wouldn't you want
> this on so you can use it for scripting, say using Samba/Active Directory
> for login management?
Does it help for authconfig to be there if samba isn't?
Figure it depends on what our cloud image is trying to achieve. Does it try to leverage any of the cloud use cases where SSO is usual / necessary? Personally, I very much doubt it.
And as Adam said, authconfig usually doesn't do anything useful unless you add a few other packages, too.
-- Sandro
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
