On 07/25/2012 04:07 PM, Robert Kukura wrote: > On 07/25/2012 06:48 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange >> <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I think I'm in favour of keeping the 'openstack-' prefix on package names too. > > Is the plan to leave all the python code in the python-nova package, > with the openstack-* packages just adding init scripts, config, and > dependencies? Or is the python code being split up as well? Ideally we would like to split out more from python-nova into each of the sub packages, which I'll look into. > In quantum, the python-quantum package currently contains the quantum > core python code, but the quantum plugin python code is in the > openstack-quantum-<plugin> subpackages. > > Is the current quantum approach consistent with the proposed approach > for nova? Yes. The more cohesive the packages the better, irrespective of whether the components are code, config or whatever. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
