On 07/25/2012 06:48 AM, Alan Pevec wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Daniel P. Berrange > <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think I'm in favour of keeping the 'openstack-' prefix on package names too. Is the plan to leave all the python code in the python-nova package, with the openstack-* packages just adding init scripts, config, and dependencies? Or is the python code being split up as well? In quantum, the python-quantum package currently contains the quantum core python code, but the quantum plugin python code is in the openstack-quantum-<plugin> subpackages. Is the current quantum approach consistent with the proposed approach for nova? -Bob > > I second that, there was actually request to rename _Debian_ packages > to have a prefix: https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg07835.html > but I'm not sure if anything came out of that. > > Cheers, > Alan > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
