Re: Ceph

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:59 AM, David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37
> to rawhide[0].
>
> I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16.
> While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of
> them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of
> bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released.
> The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1],
> Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph
> appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's
> still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there
> isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still
> very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge.
>
> Thoughts, comments, flames?

What's the impact? Are there api/abi changes that would need updates
to packages that depend on ceph?

Peter
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Archive]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

  Powered by Linux