On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 2:59 AM, David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37 > to rawhide[0]. > > I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16. > While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of > them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of > bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released. > The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1], > Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph > appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's > still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there > isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still > very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge. > > Thoughts, comments, flames? What's the impact? Are there api/abi changes that would need updates to packages that depend on ceph? Peter _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
