On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 7:59 PM, David Nalley <david@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I spent some time today trying to get ceph updated, and I pushed 0.37 > to rawhide[0]. > > I would like to solicit thoughts on pushing this to F16. > While this fixes 5 bugs in Fedora's bug tracker (and to be fair, 2 of > them are easily fixed in the current version) there are a number of > bugs fixed in the 4 months since 0.31 was released. > The downside - a number of binaries and libraries have changed name[1], > Technically this probably runs afoul of the updates policy, but ceph > appears to be a leaf package if repoquery is to be believed, and it's > still on the same major version number :). It's also true that there > isn't really the idea of a supported version of Ceph since it's still > very rapidly in development and considered quite bleeding edge. If it's a leaf package, I really don't have a problem with it. (Take that with 4 teaspoons of salt, given my vast packaging and policy experience.) My question is: I am looking at the roadmap - seeing that .39 is due in a week - and wondering just how often we'll want to update? > > Thoughts, comments, flames? > > --David > > [0] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3491795 > [1] http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&m=131673402621436&w=2 > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
