On 2011-10-04 12:06, Robyn Bergeron wrote: > > On Oct 4, 2011 12:59 PM, "Max Spevack" <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:mspevack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > I know that there was work afoot to release the F16 Beta AMi on the same > > day as the rest of F16 Beta. > > > > Is that something that is good to go? And if it's not, what was the > > thing that blocked or held up the release of the Beta? The last AMI > > that I can see owned by aws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:aws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> is > > 125523088429/Fedora-16-Beta-ec2-20110923-x86_64-sda -- I played around > > with that AMI and while I think there were a few cloud-init issues, it > > worked well enough to get the authorized_keys in the right place. > > > > I'd also recommend that it become part of the schedule and workflow to > > update the get.fedoraproject.org <http://get.fedoraproject.org> page > with a link to the AMI IDs, as > > well as the EC2 Images wiki page itself, with those AMI IDs. Not only > > for Alpha/Beta, but definitely for GA. > > > > Maybe even add a blurb to the release announcement when it talks about > > the different ways to consume Fedora. > > > > To me, those are the sorts of actions that begin to put Fedora on EC2 at > > a similar level to some of the other architectures, etc. > > > > Good think Fedora's PM and RelEng are on this list :) > > And the person who writes the release announcements, right? Heh. > > I have no idea what the status is. Dennis mentioned the other day that > the latest thing he had wasn't working (while we were in milan) - beyond > that, without a ticket or etc. i have no idea. But I do. :) cloud-init is currently doing things that make SElinux unhappy in such a way that one cannot log in. Dennis and I are working on the problem. _______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
