On Oct 4, 2011 12:59 PM, "Max Spevack" <mspevack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I know that there was work afoot to release the F16 Beta AMi on the same
> day as the rest of F16 Beta.
>
> Is that something that is good to go? And if it's not, what was the
> thing that blocked or held up the release of the Beta? The last AMI
> that I can see owned by aws@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is
> 125523088429/Fedora-16-Beta-ec2-20110923-x86_64-sda -- I played around
> with that AMI and while I think there were a few cloud-init issues, it
> worked well enough to get the authorized_keys in the right place.
>
> I'd also recommend that it become part of the schedule and workflow to
> update the get.fedoraproject.org page with a link to the AMI IDs, as
> well as the EC2 Images wiki page itself, with those AMI IDs. Not only
> for Alpha/Beta, but definitely for GA.
>
> Maybe even add a blurb to the release announcement when it talks about
> the different ways to consume Fedora.
>
> To me, those are the sorts of actions that begin to put Fedora on EC2 at
> a similar level to some of the other architectures, etc.
>
> Good think Fedora's PM and RelEng are on this list :)
And the person who writes the release announcements, right? Heh.
I have no idea what the status is. Dennis mentioned the other day that the latest thing he had wasn't working (while we were in milan) - beyond that, without a ticket or etc. i have no idea.
>
> --Max
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
