2008/5/21 Gerald Henriksen <ghenriks@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:58 +0200, you wrote: > >>Those question are particulary true for the IRAF fork, this our bigger >>project and he asks a particular involvment. As the person which will > > I think it is a bit early to talking about a fork of IRAF, and in fact > talk of forking it at this point may well cause problems with the IRAF > community. > > It appears that one of the IRAF maintainers has indicated that while > replacing the non-free portions is not a priority for them they would > consider replacing them with a contribution from outside the IRAF > project. > > http://iraf.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=86793 > > Perhaps a rewording of the task list to be less confrontational would > help with getting cooperation from the IRAF developers. > I did not know about this topic, "fork" has been the first word i thought about and also the word used during meeting(if I remember well), for i did not know the work of Sergio and the contact he has already take with the IRAF community. It has been replaced. Thanks for your precisions Gerald -- Michael Ughetto (Telimektar) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MichaelUghetto <telimektar1er@xxxxxxxxx> || <telimektar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 0x8ECBA2A4 on pgp.mit.edu _______________________________________________ Fedora astronomy mailing list Fedora-astronomy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-astronomy-list
