Re: U-Boot testing request - 2023.10 series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Nicolas,

> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > The 2023.10 RC series are now landing in F-39 and rawhide. There's
> > > been the beginnings of a few enhancements.
> > ...
> > > least be no different than the usual process but I'd like to hear any
> > > feedback.
> >
> > I have an issue on jetson-tx1 (L4T 32.7.4) with this f39 u-boot build:
> > Everything operates correctly under u-boot, but then after entering
> > initramfs the CPU hard lockup.
>
> Just some follow-up about this issue. I've tested again recently (with
> 2023.10 GA rebased from f39 packages).
> And the issue still arises with me. But it could be because of some
> mess with /boot/dtb symlink and device-tree location expectation. (my
> /boot/dtb wasn't updated

There was a bug with grub2 here, but it never made it to GA, of course
with updates-testing enabled by default anyone running pre freeze F-39
got it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243060

> When I tried to report to #u-boot upstream, it's the first question
> that was raised (is device-tree rightly found ?).
> Of course our distro patch might help

The Jetson (pre Xavier) devices won't boot without the kernel DT, the
DT provided by U-Boot has some issue around the global timer and the
kernel crashes in very early boot. It's something that I've been
meaning to look into but haven't had the time.

> The problem is that in-between I've broken my micro-usb port, so I
> cannot update u-boot anymore on the jetson-tx1 (and I'm stuck with
> fedora based u-boot 2023.07 there).

2023.07? That's still quite new.

> Anyway, I don't think it's a blocker for F39 GA, so if anyone is able
> to reproduce (or not) it is worth mentioning in the wiki.

I can reproduce, and I have been looking into it along with the issues
with the RPi4. I have currently 5 or 6 issues on my list including 3
with the RPi, these ones and possibly more. The issues for some reason
which I'm unsure about are proving very difficult to bisect which is
causing me issues around timing but overall I am hoping to get to the
bottom of them all tomorrow and a new official build done, I was
planning on replying on this thread when I have a new package for
testing.

Peter
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux