On 29-08-2022 19:32, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, at 11:12 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, at 11:10 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
There *is* a workaround, BTW - I didn't mention this in my
original mail, and probably should have. At least according to
discussion in the bug, microdnf works OK. So you can use that
instead.
Yes, but will you be able to install it? Yes you could go to koji,
download the correct RPMs, and have rpm do it without dnf but...
that'd be a pretty saucy work around.
Can microdnf and dnf co-exist? If so, maybe the non-desktops should
just include microdnf along side dnf? Or is this potentially a trap
where microdnf can also fail for the same reason (i.e. it's not dnf,
it's the size of the repo metadata)?
Yes, booth can co-exist. It was proposed at the blocker review
meeting[1] to ship microdnf by default for all spins aimed at
potentially low memory machines.
[1]
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org//fedora-blocker-review/2022-08-29/f37-blocker-review.2022-08-29-16.01.txt
-- Sandro
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
