I have looked through the source of the arm-image-installer and now
understand exactly what it is doing and yes I see how it really is not
suited to setting the FS, the image determines that.
BTRFS versions of the minimal images would be nice but I guess not
essential as I have managed until now without BTRFS on my ARM devices.
If doing BTRFS images for none-desktop images, then minimal is probably
enough as one can build up whatever they want from that.
Regards
Michael Whapples
On 14/11/2020 21:44, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 4:43 PM Michael Whapples
<contact@ashotinthedark.online> wrote:
Neal and Matthew thanks for clarifying that. Yes the various
announcements do say desktop editions, the significance of that must
have just passed me by.
would be nice if the ARM image installer would allow selecting the FS
when writing the image. Not sure how much work that would be to support.
Unfortunately, that would be very hard. If it was desired, *maybe* we
could produce alternate Btrfs-based versions for the non-desktop
variants...
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
