Re: F-30 Raspberry Pi 3B+ MMC/MicroSD sdhost-bcm2835 3f202000.mmc: timeout waiting for hardware interrupt.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 23.06.19 um 22:14 schrieb Peter Robinson:
>> Am 23.06.19 um 21:22 schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
>>> On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 12:32:14 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>> There's a few Fedora patches but nothing specific to mmc or the RPi
>>>> mmc/sdhci modules.
>>> kernel-5.0. 0-300.fc30.aarch64         PASS
>>> kernel-5.0. 0-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752827
>>> kernel-5.0.17-300.vanilla.fc30.aarch64 PASS https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=35752457
>>> kernel-5.0.17-300.fc30.aarch64         FAIL
>>>
>>> So it looks as a Fedora-specific regression somewhere in the 5.0.x series.
>> Please wait, i see that fc30 still uses this experimental cpufreq patch,
>> which is very dangerous.
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/blob/f30/f/bcm2835-cpufreq-add-CPU-frequency-control-driver.patch
>>
>> Please try to remove this patch at first
> That hasn't changed in some kernels, we've had that there for some
> time, in F-29 too
But it is still dangerous and has negative side effects on sdhost
interface. At least we should test if this has influence on the issue.
>
>>> I can continue bisecting but a hint is welcome to reduce the number of steps.
>>>
>>> Maybe Stefan Wahren is not interested if it is a Fedora specific regression?
>>>
>>> (Then sure my testing may have fuzzy results etc. but I haven't noticed
>>> anything like that yet.)
>>>
>>>
>>> Jan
>>>
>>>
>>> The vanilla kernels I have built with:
>>>       https://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/aarch64-vanilla.patch
>>> As the official --with vanilla kernel.spec flag is buggy now:
>>>       Error: rpmbuild -bs --with vanilla kernel.spec
>>>       https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547553
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
arm mailing list -- arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to arm-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/arm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM (Vger)]     [Linux ARM]     [ARM Kernel]     [Fedora User Discussion]     [Older Fedora Users Discussion]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Announce]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Centos]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Coolkey]     [Yum Users]     [Tux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Apps]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]     [Asterisk PBX]

Powered by Linux